As concerns mount regarding the US's funding of gain-of-function research on dangerous pathogens, documents from a 2014 public records request cast doubt on the honesty of health officials
I just signed on as a Founding Member. Wherever this country is headed next, and I am deeply troubled by our trajectory, it is critical that we have journalists willing to investigate controversial issues. So many of these people, Fauci, Baric, Collins, and the entire bureaucratic and political apparatuses that enabled this last 3 years of suffering need to be in prison, or swinging from the gallows. It won't happen without people like David. Go get those MFers.
“However, one has to wonder, what is the reason for such vehement denials by Collins and Fauci about their approvals for funding this type of research when the evidence shows otherwise?”
I can think of 6.8 million reasons...
If you haven’t read The Invisible Siege by Dan Werb, highly recommend. It gives insight into Baric who I suspect ghost wrote it.
Baric honestly believes he’s the savior and one person standing between humanity and our extinction from coronavirus, never reflecting on how similar he sounds to your run of the mill doomsday cult leader who *just happens* to arrive right before Aliens/Jesus/Helter Skelter wipes us out.
He honestly believes that while coronavirus have been mingling with humans freely for 3 million years, it’s only a matter of years before they evolve from common cold to super deadly pathogen-which is why he is convinced he needs to solve them into super deadly pathogen first.
No rational person can dispute this evidence.
The first peer-reviewed paper arguing for a lab origin was written by me and my dad, submitted April 2020 and published in August. After several high-level American officials emailed me and my dad to try and get us to retract it, we published a Clarification explaining that we'd just lost an link in the editing process.
That Clarification also demonstrated that the 1977 H1N1 outbreak was caused by a virus that had been subject to serial passage, to make a live-attenuated vaccine which reverted too quickly. This is also what SARS-CoV-2 is, as the article below outlines, our peer-reviewed work is linked at the top:
Their vehement denials are all that they have to do. Since no MSM will challenge anything they state publically, it's easy to maintain the lie. It reminds me of what Nixon said "I am not a crook". If no one provides concrete evidence to the contrary, the statement stands to reassure the public. Another example is Trump saying I asked Putin if he did what our intelligence team accused him of doing but he said it wasn't true. Those who trusted Trump believed him.
Thank you for your work, I really appreciate it. There are very few voices that I connect with out there right now. I wish I had access to something like this in 2020, when I felt totally lost.
Thanks for this. It would be valuable if you would list the 7 projects that were exempted., the 5 MERS and the two flu projects. The titles and the PIs and the $ amounts if available
No reaching out to anyone other than the Ebright (who is a controversial participant in the LL discourse in the least as he has made disputed claims about the timeline of grant funding to assert that the funding comprised bribes to scientists to lie about their views on the origins of SCOV-2)?
Surely a quest for "truth" would suggest an effort to get perspectives from more than just one source who is very heavily committed to a LL version of events.