Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ray Prisament's avatar

The problem with the line of argument that mask mandates don't work because people don't comply is twofold:

First, there are many places with nearly perfect compliance where they also didn't work (Japan, China, blue state school districts above the elementary level, etc.)

Second, mask advocates will read NOTHING from this conclusion other than "we need to force people to comply harder." (And you get scenes like teachers taping masks to kids' faces, which really happened.)

I think masks just don't work at a community level even under nearly perfect compliance, and it is important to emphasize that.

Great inaugural piece though and I look forward to reading more!

Expand full comment
Chuck Pezeshki's avatar

One more point. Some people in PH still can't let go of masking. So instead of just dropping this, they're demanding more study on an 'individual' level, since the population data is so damning that they don't work.

This is beyond stupid. There is a whole field for studying individual protection. It's called Industrial Hygiene, and no one in the field would recommend ANY of the masks in use for COVID for actually protecting against viruses. This question has been definitively answered. Industrial hygiene assumes that people have been trained to use some version of PPE, and are using it correctly.

The question was really "if we use these things which we KNOW would never pass muster on an individual level, on a population level, might they mitigate viral spread?" The answers clearly (as you wrote) "NO". People will continue to demand masking studies that are pro-mask, because as I have written, it is a deep psycho-social hack into their brains. They HAVE to ask.

They are in The Matrix. And no -- they don't know it. The behavior is emergent.

https://empathy.guru/2021/07/19/the-structural-memetics-of-masks/

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts